300 more positions, the same job as Volume 1: the title is a win / draw / with-care verdict.
Unlike Volume 1: more unbalanced positions, more “with care” — the result hangs on technique, not on memorised moves.
Study this after Volume 1. Ask: which condition flips the result?
- The same verdict skill, closer to real games
- See when a “win” becomes “hard” because the pawn is low or an advisor is missing
- Not treating Volume 2 as a new drill book — these are variants of Volume 1
① Which Volume 1 type is this close to?
② What differs — high/low pawn, extra advisor or elephant, one extra piece?
③ Does that difference turn a win into a draw?
Until you see what is off, don’t calculate a long line.
“Wins with care / draws with care” means a narrow margin.
① Which move is the key? Which move is only tempo?
② What if you play the “natural” move (capture, check)?
③ When done: name the condition that flips the result. Don’t memorise every move.
Still by material: pawns → horse → cannon, as in Volume 1.
Don’t skip here if you cannot yet tell win / draw / with-care in Volume 1.
A few off-balance positions per type. You need not do all 300.
1. Play it yourself. Open the line only when stuck.
2. Ask: what differs from the old type, and does the result change?
3. Volume 2 is not a different book. Same skill, harder positions.